1- Antonio Viejo Moriano, Helena Aguilar Balea, David Ares Esteve.
Alcázar de San Juan. Preliminary drawings submitted for a farther development of the urban plan.
2- Cristina Goberna, Urtzi Grau.
Cáceres. Urban project in process.
3- Miguel Ángel Velarde, Miguel Ángel Navas.
Cartes. Preliminary drawings submitted for a farther development of the project.
4- Juana Sánchez, Diego Jiménez, Ángela Ruiz, Pedro Romero.
Ceuta. Preliminary drawings submitted for a farther development of the project.
5- Beatriz Brieva de la Orden, Jaime del Campo.
Córdoba. Urban Planning submitted.
6- Santiago Cifuentes, Javier García, Luis Alió, Álvaro Martín.
Alternative project in process.

1- D. Jouquand, P. Frinault, J. Boidot / Hénin-Carvin : Urban, architectural and environmental definition study, requalification of the Parc des Iles fringes, for the Communauté Urbaine d’Hénin Carvin
2- F. Gantois / Hénin-Carvin : Urban, architectural and environmental definition study, requalification of the Parc des Iles fringes, for the Communauté Urbaine d’Hénin Carvin
3- M. Volkwein, V. Gloria, E. Vincen. Dijon. Urban, architectural and environmental feasibility study, requalification of the Pont des Tanneries District, for the City of Dijon
4- H. Loviton, K. Teisseire / La Courneuve : Urban, architectural and environmental definition study, requalification of the Quartier de la Mairie site, for Plaine Commune and the City of La Courneuve.

EUROPAN HRVATSKA
No implementation to this day.

EUROPAN ITALIA
No implementation to this day.

EUROPAN KYPROS
No implementation to this day.

EUROPAN LATVIJA
No implementation to this day.

EUROPAN MAGYARORSZAG
No implementation to this day.

1- René Berbee - Marc Holvoet, Alkmaar. The municipality made a new programme for the intervention site, after which a European tender was issued in which the winners were mentioned. At the moment it is unclear what the follow up will be.
2- Wouter van Alebeek - Joost van Noort, Dordrecht. The winning project will not be built. Waiting for an alternative commission the architects were involved in a study for 'flood proof building'. Later the development of the area was completely rescheduled.
3- Robert Verrijt - Foris Cornelisse, Enschede. The municipality decided to wait for a plan for the complete station area before deciding what to do with the winning scheme.
4- Rindert Gerritsma, Haarlem. The municipality made an urban programme of requirements for the site, based on the winning project. After that the development of the area was handed over to the market. It is not sure if the winners will be commissioned for their project. The municipality is addressed about its commitment.
5- Dominique ter Beek - Jenny Eklund - Chris Luth, Tilburg. The municipality made a ‘starting note’, after which the legal procedures for realising the project can commence.
6- Fabrice Henninger - Gabriel Kiderlen - Helga Schmid - Rainer Geerdes, Zwolle. Though the winning project will not be built, the team was to be commissioned for an alternative project, which appeared to be disputable. Unclear what the follow up will be.

(5 sites)
Hamar: Contract signed wirh Brossa Salcedo, Barcelona.
Stavanger: Contract signed with Yañez Iborra Capdevila, Alicante. 
Kirkenes: Contract signed with B4Architects, Roma and Ines Alves Almeida, Oslo (Both runner-ups)

1 – José Martín/Maria Belén SerratsMadrid (winner): Amstetten.
The architects were commissioned with a study for a master plan with Viennese architect Walter Stelzhammer as partner architect. The study was finished in autumn 2006. The city has started the rezoning procedure of parts of the area according to the premises of this study. In the beginnings of 2007 the next step of the development is being conceived. For the southern part of the area the city and the site owner intend to launch a workshop procedure including a landscape designer in order to evolve the project further. The architects were commissioned with a master scenario in cooperation with the Viennese architect Walter Stelzhammer. The result of the master scenario was further implemented in the zoning plan which determines the guidelines for a step-by step architectural implementation.
2 – Wolfgang Koelbl/Wien (winner) + cocooner/Wien (runner up): Waidhofen/Ybbs.
In spring 2006 both projects were presented to the mayor and the site owner of one of the three Europan sites. There will be a specific time frame for each single site: in 2007 the city starts negotiations to develop the meadows outside of the centre. The Europan winning project shall provide the guidelines for the future organization of the whole area. On the bene-site, the sites owners are looking for a possible investor in order to implement an educational program. Negotiations with possible partners (including the proviunce of lower Austria) hhave been ongoing since 2006 and shoudl lead to a clear program in 2007. On the basis of this program the architectural development of the Europan project can be continued. On the third site shopping, educational and cultural facilities (including housing) shall be established. Since there is a dicussion ongoing about the competition with shopping areas in the historical centre the city has delayed the development of the project. Due to economic reasons this question is until today not clarified.
3 – Mirza Mujezinovic/Oslo (winner): Wien.
The site owner has commissioned a study in order to adapt the competion project to local building guidelines. The study was finished in summer 2006. Since the second half of 2006 the site owner has been looking for clients for the commercial and public uses on ground floor. In 2008 a developer was found in order to implement the project in cooperation with the Europan winner. A workshop (completed 2008) exploited the potential of the project in the framework of subsidized housing regulations in Vienna. Next step is to find the partner architect for the implementation of about 240 housing units.

EUROPAN SLOVENIJA
No implementation to this day.

EUROPAN SUOMI-FINLAND
No implementation to this day.